head to head · open source
etcd vs juicefs
etcd has 52,439 GitHub stars, 10,551 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. juicefs has 14,613 stars, 1,332 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped yesterday. etcd leads on adoption by 259% (52,439 vs 14,613 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. juicefs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (distributed-systems, go), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| etcd | juicefs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 15K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 11K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick etcd if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick juicefs if
- You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better
About etcd
etcd Note : The main branch may be in an unstable or even broken state during development. For stable versions, see [releases][github release]. etcd is a distributed reliable key value store for the most critical data of a distributed system, with a focus on being: Simple : well defined, user facing API (gRPC) Secure : automatic TLS with optional client cert authentication Fast : benchmarked 10,000 writes/sec Reliable : properly distributed using Raft etcd is written in Go and uses the [Raft][] consensus algorithm to manage a highly available replicated log. etcd is used in production by many companies, and the…
About juicefs
JuiceFS is a high performance POSIX file system released under Apache License 2.0, particularly designed for the cloud native environment. The data, stored via JuiceFS, will be persisted in Object Storage (e.g. Amazon S3) , and the corresponding metadata can be persisted in various compatible database engines such as Redis, MySQL, and TiKV based on the scenarios and requirements. With JuiceFS, massive cloud storage can be directly connected to big data, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and various application platforms in production environments. Without modifying code, the massive cloud storage can be…
read the full juicefs overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is etcd or juicefs more popular?
etcd has 52,439 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,613. etcd has the larger community by that measure.
Are etcd and juicefs free?
Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between etcd and juicefs?
etcd is written in Go and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, etcd or juicefs?
Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,439 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.