head to head · open source
etcd vs juicefs
etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,504 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped yesterday. juicefs has 14,436 stars, 1,288 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped yesterday. etcd leads on adoption by 262% (52,270 vs 14,436 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (distributed-systems, go), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| etcd | juicefs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 14K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 11K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick etcd if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick juicefs if
- You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better
About etcd
etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.
About juicefs
JuiceFS is a Go based, Apache 2.0 distributed POSIX file system that stores file data in object storage and metadata in a database engine such as Redis, MySQL, SQLite, or TiKV, and it is aimed at cloud native infrastructure, big data, machine learning, and AI workloads.
read the full juicefs overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is etcd or juicefs more popular?
etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,436. etcd has the larger community by that measure.
Are etcd and juicefs free?
Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between etcd and juicefs?
etcd is written in Go and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, etcd or juicefs?
Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.