head to head · open source

etcd vs graphqlite

etcd has 52,328 GitHub stars, 10,525 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. graphqlite has 501 stars, 29 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. etcd leads on adoption by 10,345% (52,328 vs 501 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; graphqlite is written in C under MIT. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, graphqlite 6%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K graphqlite ★ 501 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd graphqlite
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 501
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-28 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 29
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick graphqlite if

  • You want the graphqlite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and graphqlite fits your workflow better

full graphqlite profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About graphqlite

GraphQLite is an MIT licensed SQLite extension, written in C, that adds graph database capabilities to SQLite through the Cypher query language and built in graph algorithms, and it is aimed at developers and data teams who want to store and query connected data inside an ordinary SQLite database rather than operating a separate graph server.

read the full graphqlite overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or graphqlite more popular?

etcd has 52,328 GitHub stars and graphqlite has 501. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and graphqlite free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and graphqlite under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and graphqlite?

etcd is written in Go and graphqlite in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or graphqlite?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,328 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose graphqlite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.