head to head · open source
etcd vs Conar
etcd has 52,441 GitHub stars, 10,552 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Conar has 1,464 stars, 107 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped yesterday. etcd leads on adoption by 3,482% (52,441 vs 1,464 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Conar is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, Conar 7%. Conar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| etcd | Conar | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 11K | ⑂ 107 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick etcd if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Conar if
- You want the Conar feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Conar fits your workflow better
About etcd
etcd Note : The main branch may be in an unstable or even broken state during development. For stable versions, see [releases][github release]. etcd is a distributed reliable key value store for the most critical data of a distributed system, with a focus on being: Simple : well defined, user facing API (gRPC) Secure : automatic TLS with optional client cert authentication Fast : benchmarked 10,000 writes/sec Reliable : properly distributed using Raft etcd is written in Go and uses the [Raft][] consensus algorithm to manage a highly available replicated log. etcd is used in production by many companies, and the…
About Conar
Tamery.app Tamery is an AI powered open source project that simplifies database interactions. Built for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL, Clickhouse with support for other databases coming in the near future. Store your connections securely in our cloud and ask AI to help you write and optimize SQL queries. Features 🔐 Secure & Open Open source codebase Encrypted connection strings Password protection 💾 Multi Database Support PostgreSQL MySQL MSSQL Clickhouse Sqlite (coming soon) MongoDB (coming soon) 🤖 AI Powered Features Intelligent SQL assistance Ability to change AI model More coming soon.. Stack React with…
read the full Conar overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is etcd or Conar more popular?
etcd has 52,441 GitHub stars and Conar has 1,464. etcd has the larger community by that measure.
Are etcd and Conar free?
Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Conar under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between etcd and Conar?
etcd is written in Go and Conar in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, etcd or Conar?
Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,441 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Conar if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.