head to head · open source

etcd vs centrifugo

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,506 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped today. centrifugo has 10,762 stars, 733 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. etcd leads on adoption by 386% (52,270 vs 10,762 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; centrifugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, centrifugo 7%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K centrifugo ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd centrifugo
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 733
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick centrifugo if

  • You want the centrifugo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and centrifugo fits your workflow better

full centrifugo profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About centrifugo

Centrifugo is an open source, language agnostic real time messaging server that delivers messages to online users over WebSocket, HTTP streaming, Server Sent Events, GRPC, and WebTransport, and it is built for teams that want user facing PUB/SUB without writing and operating the transport layer themselves.

read the full centrifugo overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or centrifugo more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and centrifugo has 10,762. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and centrifugo free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and centrifugo under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and centrifugo?

etcd is written in Go and centrifugo in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or centrifugo?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose centrifugo if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.