head to head · open source

etcd vs Azimutt

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,504 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Azimutt has 2,181 stars, 141 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. etcd leads on adoption by 2,297% (52,270 vs 2,181 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Azimutt is written in Elm under MIT. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, Azimutt 6%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K Azimutt ★ 2.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd Azimutt
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 2.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Elm
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-25
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 141
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick Azimutt if

  • You want the Azimutt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Elm
  • You evaluated both and Azimutt fits your workflow better

full Azimutt profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About Azimutt

Azimutt is a full stack database exploration tool built in Elm and released under the MIT license. It presents itself as a next generation entity relationship diagram application for designing, exploring, documenting, and analyzing database schemas and data. The project lives in the database tooling ecosystem, positioned between ERD tools, data catalogs, and database clients.

read the full Azimutt overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or Azimutt more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and Azimutt has 2,181. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and Azimutt free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Azimutt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and Azimutt ?

etcd is written in Go and Azimutt in Elm. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or Azimutt ?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Azimutt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.