head to head · open source
Encore vs reviewdog
Encore has 12,369 GitHub stars, 622 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. reviewdog has 9,601 stars, 495 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Encore leads on adoption by 29% (12,369 vs 9,601 stars). Encore is written in Go under MPL-2.0; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. Encore has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. reviewdog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (go), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Encore | reviewdog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 12K | ★ 9.6K |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 622 | ⑂ 495 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Encore if
- You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
- You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewdog if
- You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better
About Encore
Encore is an open source infrastructure platform for backend development, written in Go under MPL 2.0. It lives in the Go and TypeScript cloud native ecosystem and lets developers declare databases, Pub/Sub, object storage, caches, cron jobs, and secrets in application code. The project combines an infrastructure SDK with an optional managed platform that deploys to a user's AWS or GCP account.
read the full Encore overview →
About reviewdog
reviewdog is an automated code review tool written in Go and released under the MIT license. It lives in the version control and collaboration space of the developer tooling ecosystem, and it integrates with code analysis tools regardless of programming language. Rather than performing analysis itself, reviewdog consumes the output of existing linters and static analysis tools and turns those findings into review comments on code hosting services. The project has been published for roughly ten years, carries more than nine thousand stars and close to five hundred forks, and its topic list covers CI, linting, stat…
read the full reviewdog overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Encore or reviewdog more popular?
Encore has 12,369 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,601. Encore has the larger community by that measure.
Are Encore and reviewdog free?
Both are open source. Encore is licensed under MPL-2.0 and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Encore and reviewdog?
Encore is written in Go and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Encore or reviewdog?
Choose Encore if you want the larger community (12,369 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.