head to head · open source

effect vs CocoaLumberjack

effect has 16,097 GitHub stars, 747 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CocoaLumberjack has 13,319 stars, 2,274 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. effect leads on adoption by 21% (16,097 vs 13,319 stars). effect is written in TypeScript under MIT; CocoaLumberjack is written in Objective-C under BSD-3-Clause. effect has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, CocoaLumberjack 17%. effect was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

effect ★ 16K CocoaLumberjack ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

effect CocoaLumberjack
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 13K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in TypeScript Objective-C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 747 ⑂ 2.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick effect if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full effect profile →

pick CocoaLumberjack if

  • You want the CocoaLumberjack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Objective-C
  • You evaluated both and CocoaLumberjack fits your workflow better

full CocoaLumberjack profile →

About effect

Effect is a TypeScript library for building robust, maintainable, type safe, and production grade applications. It lives in the TypeScript and JavaScript ecosystem, distributed as the core effect package alongside a monorepo of integration packages that extend it. The project is MIT licensed, has been developed for roughly seven years, and currently ships Effect V4 as a release candidate, with the main branch holding v4 development and the v3 branch retaining the previous line.

read the full effect overview →

About CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast and flexible logging framework, written primarily in Objective C with first class Swift support, for applications targeting macOS, iOS, tvOS, watchOS and visionOS.

read the full CocoaLumberjack overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

effect vs Uptime Kuma effect vs worldmonitor effect vs NetData effect vs Grafana effect vs huginn effect vs Sentry effect vs SigNoz effect vs Grafana Loki effect vs beszel effect vs cilium effect vs Apache SkyWalking effect vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is effect or CocoaLumberjack more popular?

effect has 16,097 GitHub stars and CocoaLumberjack has 13,319. effect has the larger community by that measure.

Are effect and CocoaLumberjack free?

Both are open source. effect is licensed under MIT and CocoaLumberjack under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between effect and CocoaLumberjack?

effect is written in TypeScript and CocoaLumberjack in Objective-C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, effect or CocoaLumberjack?

Choose effect if you want the larger community (16,097 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CocoaLumberjack if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.