head to head · open source
dapr vs swarmclaw
dapr has 26,174 GitHub stars, 2,172 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped yesterday. swarmclaw has 703 stars, 144 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. dapr leads on adoption by 3,623% (26,174 vs 703 stars). dapr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; swarmclaw is written in TypeScript under MIT. dapr has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, swarmclaw 20%. dapr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| dapr | swarmclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 26K | ★ 703 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 144 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick dapr if
- You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick swarmclaw if
- You want the swarmclaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and swarmclaw fits your workflow better
About dapr
The runtime for durable execution, AI agents, and secure distributed applications [![Go Report][go report badge]][go report url] [![OpenSSF][openssf badge]][openssf url] [![Docker Pulls][docker badge]][docker url] [![Build Status][actions badge]][actions url] [![Test Status][e2e badge]][e2e url] [![Code Coverage][codecov badge]][codecov url] [![License: Apache 2.0][apache badge]][apache url] [![FOSSA Status][fossa badge]][fossa url] [![TODOs][todo badge]][todo url] [![Good First Issues][gfi badge]][gfi url] [![discord][discord badge]][discord url] [![YouTube][youtube badge]][youtube link] [![Bluesky][bluesky…
About swarmclaw
SwarmClaw The self hosted AI agent runtime and multi agent framework for autonomous agents. Open source agent swarms with durable agent memory, MCP tools, skills, delegation, schedules, and 23+ LLM providers — a practical Claude Code and LangChain alternative. SwarmClaw is an open source, self hosted AI agent runtime and multi agent framework. Run autonomous AI agents, agent swarms, and orchestrators with heartbeats, schedules, delegation, agent memory, runtime skills, and reviewed conversation to skill learning — across OpenClaw gateways, Claude, GPT, Gemini, OpenRouter, Ollama, and 23+ other providers. Use it…
read the full swarmclaw overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is dapr or swarmclaw more popular?
dapr has 26,174 GitHub stars and swarmclaw has 703. dapr has the larger community by that measure.
Are dapr and swarmclaw free?
Both are open source. dapr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and swarmclaw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between dapr and swarmclaw?
dapr is written in Go and swarmclaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, dapr or swarmclaw?
Choose dapr if you want the larger community (26,174 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose swarmclaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.