head to head · open source

cyberduck vs OxiCloud

cyberduck has 4,788 GitHub stars, 369 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OxiCloud has 3,578 stars, 171 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cyberduck leads on adoption by 34% (4,788 vs 3,578 stars). cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0; OxiCloud is written in Rust under MIT. cyberduck has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, OxiCloud 5%. OxiCloud was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dropbox), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cyberduck ★ 4.8K OxiCloud ★ 3.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cyberduck OxiCloud
GitHub stars ★ 4.8K ★ 3.6K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Java Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 369 ⑂ 171
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cyberduck if

  • You weight community size — 4.8K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cyberduck profile →

pick OxiCloud if

  • You want the OxiCloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and OxiCloud fits your workflow better

full OxiCloud profile →

About cyberduck

Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.

read the full cyberduck overview →

About OxiCloud

OxiCloud is a self hosted cloud storage suite written in Rust that gives self hosters, home labs, and small teams files, photos, calendars, and contacts in a single lightweight deployment, aimed at anyone who wants the useful parts of a cloud suite without the operational weight of a traditional PHP stack.

read the full OxiCloud overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cyberduck vs LocalSend cyberduck vs rclone cyberduck vs copyparty cyberduck vs Files cyberduck vs yazi cyberduck vs Spacedrive cyberduck vs Nextcloud cyberduck vs uppy cyberduck vs cloudreve cyberduck vs superfile cyberduck vs ranger cyberduck vs Seafile

Frequently asked questions

Is cyberduck or OxiCloud more popular?

cyberduck has 4,788 GitHub stars and OxiCloud has 3,578. cyberduck has the larger community by that measure.

Are cyberduck and OxiCloud free?

Both are open source. cyberduck is licensed under GPL-3.0 and OxiCloud under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cyberduck and OxiCloud?

cyberduck is written in Java and OxiCloud in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cyberduck or OxiCloud?

Choose cyberduck if you want the larger community (4,788 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose OxiCloud if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.