head to head · open source
cyberduck vs Meteor-Files
cyberduck has 4,904 GitHub stars, 389 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Meteor-Files has 1,113 stars, 165 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. cyberduck leads on adoption by 341% (4,904 vs 1,113 stars). cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0; Meteor-Files is written in JavaScript under BSD-3-Clause. cyberduck has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Meteor-Files 15%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (dropbox, google-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| cyberduck | Meteor-Files | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.9K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | Java | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-08 | 2026-10-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 389 | ⑂ 165 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick cyberduck if
- You weight community size — 4.9K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Meteor-Files if
- You want the Meteor-Files feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Meteor-Files fits your workflow better
About cyberduck
Cyberduck This is the development home for Cyberduck, a libre file transfer client for macOS and Windows. Command line interface (CLI) for Linux, macOS and Windows. The core libraries are used in Mountain Duck. Mailing Lists There is a Google Groups Cyberduck discussion mailing list. The following additional mailing lists are hosted: News Announcements of new releases Localization Notifications about changes to the translations needed Source Source code is available licensed under the GNU General Public License Version 3. Pull requests welcome! Localizations Translations to new languages are welcome. We use…
read the full cyberduck overview →
About Meteor-Files
Files for Meteor.js Stable, fast, robust, and well maintained Meteor.js package for files management using MongoDB Collection API. Call .insertAsync() method to initiate a file upload and to insert new record into MongoDB collection after upload is complete. Calling .removeAsync() method would erase stored file and record from MongoDB Collection. And so on, no need to learn new APIs. Hackable via hooks and events. Supports uploads to AWS:S3, GridFS, Google Storage, DropBox, and other 3rd party storage. ToC: 📔 Documentation Docs, API, Demos, Examples ✨ Key features 📔 API Documentation ⚡️ Quick start : 🔧…
read the full Meteor-Files overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is cyberduck or Meteor-Files more popular?
cyberduck has 4,904 GitHub stars and Meteor-Files has 1,113. cyberduck has the larger community by that measure.
Are cyberduck and Meteor-Files free?
Both are open source. cyberduck is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Meteor-Files under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between cyberduck and Meteor-Files?
cyberduck is written in Java and Meteor-Files in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, cyberduck or Meteor-Files?
Choose cyberduck if you want the larger community (4,904 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Meteor-Files if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.