head to head · open source

cyberduck vs Meteor-Files

cyberduck has 4,806 GitHub stars, 371 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Meteor-Files has 1,116 stars, 165 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. cyberduck leads on adoption by 331% (4,806 vs 1,116 stars). cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0; Meteor-Files is written in JavaScript under BSD-3-Clause. cyberduck has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Meteor-Files 15%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (dropbox, google-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cyberduck ★ 4.8K Meteor-Files ★ 1.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cyberduck Meteor-Files
GitHub stars ★ 4.8K ★ 1.1K
License GPL-3.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Java JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 371 ⑂ 165
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cyberduck if

  • You weight community size — 4.8K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cyberduck profile →

pick Meteor-Files if

  • You want the Meteor-Files feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Meteor-Files fits your workflow better

full Meteor-Files profile →

About cyberduck

Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.

read the full cyberduck overview →

About Meteor-Files

Meteor Files is an open source Meteor.js package, published as ostrio:files under the BSD 3 Clause licence, that adds file upload and file management to Meteor applications using the MongoDB Collection API, and it is aimed at JavaScript developers building on Meteor.js who need uploads without adopting a separate file handling API.

read the full Meteor-Files overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cyberduck vs LocalSend cyberduck vs rclone cyberduck vs copyparty cyberduck vs Files cyberduck vs yazi cyberduck vs Spacedrive cyberduck vs Nextcloud cyberduck vs uppy cyberduck vs cloudreve cyberduck vs superfile cyberduck vs ranger cyberduck vs Seafile

Frequently asked questions

Is cyberduck or Meteor-Files more popular?

cyberduck has 4,806 GitHub stars and Meteor-Files has 1,116. cyberduck has the larger community by that measure.

Are cyberduck and Meteor-Files free?

Both are open source. cyberduck is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Meteor-Files under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cyberduck and Meteor-Files?

cyberduck is written in Java and Meteor-Files in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cyberduck or Meteor-Files?

Choose cyberduck if you want the larger community (4,806 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Meteor-Files if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.