head to head · open source

uppy vs cryfs

uppy has 30,989 GitHub stars, 2,103 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cryfs has 2,304 stars, 170 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. uppy leads on adoption by 1,245% (30,989 vs 2,304 stars). uppy is written in TypeScript under MIT; cryfs is written in Rust under LGPL-3.0. uppy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, cryfs 7%. uppy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dropbox), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

uppy ★ 31K cryfs ★ 2.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

uppy cryfs
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 2.3K
License MIT LGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick uppy if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full uppy profile →

pick cryfs if

  • You want the cryfs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and cryfs fits your workflow better

full cryfs profile →

About uppy

Uppy is an MIT licensed, TypeScript built, modular JavaScript file uploader for web browsers that drops into any web application, aimed at developers who would rather wire up plugins than build file uploading from scratch.

read the full uppy overview →

About cryfs

CryFS is a FUSE based cryptographic filesystem written in Rust that encrypts a vault directory so it can be stored safely in cloud services such as Dropbox, iCloud, or OneDrive, and it is intended for Linux users who want their file contents, file sizes, directory structure, and metadata hidden from the storage provider rather than encrypted one file at a time.

read the full cryfs overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs uppy localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

uppy vs LocalSend uppy vs rclone uppy vs copyparty uppy vs Files uppy vs yazi uppy vs Spacedrive uppy vs Nextcloud uppy vs cloudreve uppy vs superfile uppy vs ranger uppy vs Seafile uppy vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is uppy or cryfs more popular?

uppy has 30,989 GitHub stars and cryfs has 2,304. uppy has the larger community by that measure.

Are uppy and cryfs free?

Both are open source. uppy is licensed under MIT and cryfs under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between uppy and cryfs?

uppy is written in TypeScript and cryfs in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, uppy or cryfs?

Choose uppy if you want the larger community (30,989 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cryfs if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.