head to head · open source

Coolify vs Temps

Coolify has 61,942 GitHub stars, 5,489 forks, 649 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Temps has 756 stars, 59 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Coolify leads on adoption by 8,093% (61,942 vs 756 stars). Coolify is written in PHP under Apache-2.0; Temps is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Coolify has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Temps 8%. Coolify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Coolify ★ 62K Temps ★ 756 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Coolify Temps
GitHub stars ★ 62K ★ 756
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in PHP Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 59
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Coolify if

  • You weight community size — 62K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Coolify profile →

pick Temps if

  • You want the Temps feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Temps fits your workflow better

full Temps profile →

About Coolify

Coolify is an open source, self hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS) designed to replace commercial services like Vercel, Heroku, and Netlify. It runs on user provided infrastructure—VPS, bare metal, or Raspberry Pi—and automates deployment, scaling, and management of applications, databases, and services using Docker and Docker Compose. Built with Laravel and PHP, it lives in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, targeting developers and DevOps teams seeking vendor lock in free control over their deployment stack.

read the full Coolify overview →

About Temps

Temps is an Apache 2.0 licensed Rust binary that combines deployment, monitoring, analytics, error tracking, email, OpenTelemetry, sandboxes, and an AI gateway in one self hosted system. It is positioned as an alternative to Vercel, Sentry, PostHog, Pingdom, Resend, and E2B.

read the full Temps overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

coolify vs dokploy coolify vs casaos coolify vs 1panel coolify vs refine dokploy vs casaos dokploy vs 1panel casaos vs 1panel dokploy vs refine uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Server & VM Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Server & VM Management field.

Coolify vs Dokploy Coolify vs CasaOS Coolify vs 1Panel Coolify vs Refine Coolify vs Cosmos Server Coolify vs aaPanel Coolify vs YunoHost Coolify vs OpenPanel

Frequently asked questions

Is Coolify or Temps more popular?

Coolify has 61,942 GitHub stars and Temps has 756. Coolify has the larger community by that measure.

Are Coolify and Temps free?

Both are open source. Coolify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Temps under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Coolify and Temps?

Coolify is written in PHP and Temps in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Coolify or Temps?

Choose Coolify if you want the larger community (61,942 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Temps if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.