head to head · open source

Jitsu vs Convertigo

Jitsu has 5,083 GitHub stars, 400 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Convertigo has 385 stars, 71 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Jitsu leads on adoption by 1,220% (5,083 vs 385 stars). Jitsu is written in TypeScript under MIT; Convertigo is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. Jitsu has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Convertigo 18%. Jitsu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jitsu ★ 5.1K Convertigo ★ 385 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jitsu Convertigo
GitHub stars ★ 5.1K ★ 385
License MIT Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 400 ⑂ 71
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jitsu if

  • You weight community size — 5.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jitsu profile →

pick Convertigo if

  • You want the Convertigo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Convertigo fits your workflow better

full Convertigo profile →

About Jitsu

Jitsu is an MIT licensed, self hostable open source event data platform that collects events from websites, apps and servers and delivers them to data warehouses and other tools, built as a fully scriptable alternative to Segment for data teams and developers who want the pipeline inside their own infrastructure.

read the full Jitsu overview →

About Convertigo

Convertigo is an open source, AI driven low code and no code platform for building and running full stack enterprise web, mobile, and PWA business applications, aimed at professional developers who program back end microservice workflows and at non technical citizen developers who assemble form based apps.

read the full Convertigo overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

opencode vs jitsu opencode vs convertigo nango vs jitsu nango vs convertigo opencode vs nango opencode vs aci-dev opencode vs orbital nango vs aci-dev opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Integration Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Integration Platforms field.

Jitsu vs Nango Jitsu vs ACI.dev Jitsu vs Orbital

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsu or Convertigo more popular?

Jitsu has 5,083 GitHub stars and Convertigo has 385. Jitsu has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jitsu and Convertigo free?

Both are open source. Jitsu is licensed under MIT, and Convertigo has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Jitsu and Convertigo?

Jitsu is written in TypeScript and Convertigo in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jitsu or Convertigo?

Choose Jitsu if you want the larger community (5,083 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Convertigo if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.