head to head · open source

Jitsu vs Orbital

Jitsu has 5,083 GitHub stars, 400 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Orbital has 360 stars, 14 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Jitsu leads on adoption by 1,312% (5,083 vs 360 stars). Jitsu is written in TypeScript under MIT; Orbital is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Jitsu has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Orbital 4%. Jitsu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jitsu ★ 5.1K Orbital ★ 360 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jitsu Orbital
GitHub stars ★ 5.1K ★ 360
License MIT Custom / other
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-25
Forks ⑂ 400 ⑂ 14
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jitsu if

  • You weight community size — 5.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jitsu profile →

pick Orbital if

  • You want the Orbital feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Orbital fits your workflow better

full Orbital profile →

About Jitsu

Jitsu is an MIT licensed, self hostable open source event data platform that collects events from websites, apps and servers and delivers them to data warehouses and other tools, built as a fully scriptable alternative to Segment for data teams and developers who want the pipeline inside their own infrastructure.

read the full Jitsu overview →

About Orbital

Orbital is an open source data gateway that connects APIs, databases, queues and functions without hand written glue code, aimed at platform, integration and data engineers building BFFs, API composition layers and ETL pipelines.

read the full Orbital overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

opencode vs jitsu opencode vs orbital nango vs jitsu opencode vs nango opencode vs aci-dev opencode vs convertigo nango vs aci-dev nango vs convertigo opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Integration Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Integration Platforms field.

Jitsu vs Nango Jitsu vs ACI.dev Jitsu vs Convertigo

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsu or Orbital more popular?

Jitsu has 5,083 GitHub stars and Orbital has 360. Jitsu has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jitsu and Orbital free?

Both are open source. Jitsu is licensed under MIT, and Orbital has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Jitsu and Orbital?

Jitsu is written in TypeScript and Orbital in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jitsu or Orbital?

Choose Jitsu if you want the larger community (5,083 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Orbital if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.