head to head · open source
conductor vs munder-difflin
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars, 1,051 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. munder-difflin has 9,300 stars, 1,303 forks, 172 open issues and last shipped yesterday. conductor leads on adoption by 248% (32,401 vs 9,300 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; munder-difflin is written in JavaScript under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, munder-difflin 14%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | munder-difflin | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 9.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick munder-difflin if
- You want the munder-difflin feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and munder-difflin fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About munder-difflin
Munder Difflin Agent harness to run an office of your clones Free, open source and performant — a multi agent harness that works with the subscriptions you already pay for, on their hourly limits. It turns the terminal coding CLI you already run into a clone of you, one that keeps working while you're away and coordinates a whole office of agents on your own machine. Wraps Claude Code, Antigravity (Gemini), OpenAI Codex, xAI Grok , Kimi Code , Gemini CLI , Qwen , OpenCode , Crush , pi.dev , GitHub Copilot CLI , and Cursor — with bring your own keys and local LLMs. Agents that message, route, and remember…
read the full munder-difflin overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or munder-difflin more popular?
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars and munder-difflin has 9,300. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and munder-difflin free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and munder-difflin under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and munder-difflin?
conductor is written in Java and munder-difflin in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or munder-difflin?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,401 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose munder-difflin if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.