head to head · open source
conductor vs gocron
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped today. gocron has 809 stars, 62 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 3,881% (32,207 vs 809 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; gocron is written in Go under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, gocron 8%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | gocron | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 809 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 62 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gocron if
- You want the gocron feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and gocron fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About gocron
gocron A lightweight distributed scheduled task management system developed in Go, designed to replace Linux crontab. English · 简体中文 Agent Auto Registration Task Management AI Failure Diagnosis 📖 Documentation Full documentation is available at: document 🚀 Quick Start Installation and deployment guide 🤖 Agent Auto Registration One click task node deployment ⚙️ Configuration Detailed configuration guide 🔌 API Documentation API reference ✨ Features Web Interface : Intuitive task management interface Second level Precision : Supports Crontab expressions with second precision High Availability : Database lock bas…
read the full gocron overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or gocron more popular?
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and gocron has 809. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and gocron free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and gocron under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and gocron?
conductor is written in Java and gocron in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or gocron?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose gocron if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.