head to head · open source
conductor vs ftpgrab
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped today. ftpgrab has 562 stars, 77 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 5,631% (32,207 vs 562 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; ftpgrab is written in Go under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, ftpgrab 14%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | ftpgrab | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 562 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 77 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ftpgrab if
- You want the ftpgrab feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and ftpgrab fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About ftpgrab
About FTPGrab is a command line tool for pulling files from remote FTP and SFTP servers to your NAS, server, or computer. It is built for unattended transfers: you can point it at one or more remote sources, run it on a schedule, filter what should be downloaded, and avoid re downloading files that were already grabbed. It can also send notifications after runs, so you can keep track of successful downloads, failures, and other activity without babysitting the job. It works well for seedboxes, home servers, and any setup where files need to move reliably from a remote server to local storage. FTPGrab is available…
read the full ftpgrab overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or ftpgrab more popular?
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and ftpgrab has 562. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and ftpgrab free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ftpgrab under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and ftpgrab?
conductor is written in Java and ftpgrab in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or ftpgrab?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ftpgrab if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.