head to head · open source
conductor vs database-lab-engine
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars, 1,051 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. database-lab-engine has 2,786 stars, 90 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 1,063% (32,401 vs 2,786 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; database-lab-engine is written in Go under Apache-2.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, database-lab-engine 3%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | database-lab-engine | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 2.8K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 90 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick database-lab-engine if
- You want the database-lab-engine feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and database-lab-engine fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About database-lab-engine
Deutsch Português (BR) Русский Español Українська DBLab Engine ⚡ Blazing fast PostgreSQL cloning and branching 🐘 🛠️ Build powerful dev/test environments. 🔃 Cover 100% of DB migrations with CI tests. 💡 Quickly verify ChatGPT ideas to get rid of hallucinations. Available for any PostgreSQL, including self managed and managed services like AWS RDS, GCP Cloud SQL, Supabase, and Timescale. It can be installed and used anywhere: across all cloud environments and on premises. Features Documentation Blog Community & Support Contributing For managed PostgreSQL cloud services like AWS RDS or Heroku, direct physical…
read the full database-lab-engine overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or database-lab-engine more popular?
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars and database-lab-engine has 2,786. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and database-lab-engine free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and database-lab-engine under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and database-lab-engine?
conductor is written in Java and database-lab-engine in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or database-lab-engine?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,401 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose database-lab-engine if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.