head to head · open source
SigNoz vs codeburn
SigNoz has 32,146 GitHub stars, 2,497 forks, 1,557 open issues and last shipped today. codeburn has 11,114 stars, 843 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped today. SigNoz leads on adoption by 189% (32,146 vs 11,114 stars). SigNoz is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. SigNoz has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. SigNoz was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (observability), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| SigNoz | codeburn | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 11K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.5K | ⑂ 843 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick SigNoz if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codeburn if
- You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better
About SigNoz
SigNoz is an open source, OpenTelemetry native observability platform for cloud native applications. It unifies logs, metrics, traces, alerts, and dashboards into a single tool, replacing fragmented monitoring stacks with a correlated signal pipeline. It lives in the observability ecosystem alongside tools like Prometheus, Jaeger, and Grafana, and is positioned as an open alternative to Datadog.
read the full SigNoz overview →
About codeburn
CodeBurn is a free, open source, local first tool that tracks AI coding token usage and cost across 41 tools and agents, including Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, and Grok. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under MIT, and lives in the developer tools and observability ecosystem as a command line utility with optional desktop surfaces. Every surface reads the session files that the supported tools already write to disk, so CodeBurn acts as one source of truth rather than a separate collection layer.
read the full codeburn overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is SigNoz or codeburn more popular?
SigNoz has 32,146 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,114. SigNoz has the larger community by that measure.
Are SigNoz and codeburn free?
Both are open source. SigNoz has no licence declared in this registry, and codeburn is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between SigNoz and codeburn?
SigNoz is written in TypeScript and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, SigNoz or codeburn?
Choose SigNoz if you want the larger community (32,146 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.