head to head · open source
SigNoz vs codeburn
SigNoz has 32,528 GitHub stars, 2,575 forks, 1,557 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codeburn has 11,682 stars, 909 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SigNoz leads on adoption by 178% (32,528 vs 11,682 stars). SigNoz is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. SigNoz has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. SigNoz was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (observability), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| SigNoz | codeburn | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 12K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 909 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick SigNoz if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codeburn if
- You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better
About SigNoz
中文 · Deutsch · Português SigNoz is an open source observability platform built on OpenTelemetry. We’re building an enterprise grade alternative to fragmented monitoring stacks, with logs, metrics, traces, alerts, and dashboards in one place. Choose how to run SigNoz SigNoz Cloud (Recommended) Fully managed SigNoz with a 30 day free trial, no credit card required, usage based pricing that starts at $49, and regional data hosting. Start free → Enterprise Enterprise Cloud, BYOC, or Enterprise Self Hosted with compliance, support, custom retention, RBAC, ingestion controls, data residency, and region selection…
read the full SigNoz overview →
About codeburn
See where your AI spend goes. If CodeBurn shows you something your bill never did, star the repo so other developers find it, and consider sponsoring to keep 41 integrations honest. npx codeburn To keep it: npm install g codeburn or brew install codeburn . Needs Node.js 22.13+. Desktop app 0.9.25. The macOS builds are signed with a Developer ID and notarized by Apple. The problem Your bill gives you a month total. It does not break that down by project, by model or by task, and it does not show which part of it was wasted. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and the rest each write a session file every time you use them…
read the full codeburn overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is SigNoz or codeburn more popular?
SigNoz has 32,528 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,682. SigNoz has the larger community by that measure.
Are SigNoz and codeburn free?
Both are open source. SigNoz has no licence declared in this registry, and codeburn is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between SigNoz and codeburn?
SigNoz is written in TypeScript and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, SigNoz or codeburn?
Choose SigNoz if you want the larger community (32,528 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.