head to head · open source
Grafana vs codeburn
Grafana has 76,813 GitHub stars, 14,758 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped today. codeburn has 11,114 stars, 843 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped today. Grafana leads on adoption by 591% (76,813 vs 11,114 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. codeburn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana | codeburn | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 77K | ★ 11K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 843 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana if
- You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codeburn if
- You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better
About Grafana
Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.
read the full Grafana overview →
About codeburn
CodeBurn is a free, open source, local first tool that tracks AI coding token usage and cost across 41 tools and agents, including Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, and Grok. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under MIT, and lives in the developer tools and observability ecosystem as a command line utility with optional desktop surfaces. Every surface reads the session files that the supported tools already write to disk, so CodeBurn acts as one source of truth rather than a separate collection layer.
read the full codeburn overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana or codeburn more popular?
Grafana has 76,813 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,114. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana and codeburn free?
Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and codeburn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana and codeburn?
Grafana is written in TypeScript and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana or codeburn?
Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,813 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.