head to head · open source
beszel vs codeburn
beszel has 26,834 GitHub stars, 1,143 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. codeburn has 11,682 stars, 909 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped yesterday. beszel leads on adoption by 130% (26,834 vs 11,682 stars). beszel is written in Go under MIT; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. beszel has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. codeburn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| beszel | codeburn | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 909 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick beszel if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codeburn if
- You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better
About beszel
Beszel Beszel is a lightweight server monitoring platform that includes Docker statistics, historical data, and alert functions. It has a friendly web interface, simple configuration, and is ready to use out of the box. It supports automatic backup, multi user, OAuth authentication, and API access. Features Lightweight : Smaller and less resource intensive than leading solutions. Simple : Easy setup with little manual configuration required. Docker stats : Tracks CPU, memory, and network usage history for each container. ZFS : Tracks pool capacity, health, and I/O, plus per dataset usage. Alerts : Configurable…
read the full beszel overview →
About codeburn
See where your AI spend goes. If CodeBurn shows you something your bill never did, star the repo so other developers find it, and consider sponsoring to keep 41 integrations honest. npx codeburn To keep it: npm install g codeburn or brew install codeburn . Needs Node.js 22.13+. Desktop app 0.9.25. The macOS builds are signed with a Developer ID and notarized by Apple. The problem Your bill gives you a month total. It does not break that down by project, by model or by task, and it does not show which part of it was wasted. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and the rest each write a session file every time you use them…
read the full codeburn overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is beszel or codeburn more popular?
beszel has 26,834 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,682. beszel has the larger community by that measure.
Are beszel and codeburn free?
Both are open source. beszel is licensed under MIT and codeburn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between beszel and codeburn?
beszel is written in Go and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, beszel or codeburn?
Choose beszel if you want the larger community (26,834 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.