head to head · open source
CocoIndex vs peerdb
CocoIndex has 11,812 GitHub stars, 923 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped yesterday. peerdb has 3,313 stars, 232 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CocoIndex leads on adoption by 257% (11,812 vs 3,313 stars). CocoIndex is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; peerdb is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. CocoIndex has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, peerdb 7%. peerdb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (etl), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CocoIndex | peerdb | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 12K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 923 | ⑂ 232 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CocoIndex if
- You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick peerdb if
- You want the peerdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and peerdb fits your workflow better
About CocoIndex
Your agents deserve fresh context. Star us ❤️ → · · · CocoIndex turns codebases, meeting notes, inboxes, Slack, PDFs, and videos into live, continuously fresh context for your AI agents and LLM apps to reason over effectively — with minimal incremental processing. Get your production AI agent ready in 10 minutes with reliable, continuously fresh data — no stale batches, no context gap Incremental · only the delta · Any scale · parallel by default · Declarative · Python, 5 min Deutsch English Español français 日本語 한국어 Português Русский 中文 Built with CocoIndex ❤️ <img src=" alt="CocoIndex code — flagship MCP server…
read the full CocoIndex overview →
About peerdb
Frustratingly simple ETL for Postgres PeerDB At PeerDB, we are building a fast, simple and the most cost effective way to stream data from Postgres to Data Warehouses, Queues and Storage engines. If you are running Postgres at the heart of your data stack and move data at scale from Postgres to any of the above targets, PeerDB can provide value. We support different modes of streaming log based (CDC), cursor based (timestamp or integer) and XMIN based. Performance wise, we are 10x faster than existing tools. Features wise, we support native Postgres features such as comprehensive set of data types incl…
read the full peerdb overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Engineering & Integration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CocoIndex or peerdb more popular?
CocoIndex has 11,812 GitHub stars and peerdb has 3,313. CocoIndex has the larger community by that measure.
Are CocoIndex and peerdb free?
Both are open source. CocoIndex is licensed under Apache-2.0 and peerdb under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CocoIndex and peerdb?
CocoIndex is written in Rust and peerdb in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CocoIndex or peerdb?
Choose CocoIndex if you want the larger community (11,812 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose peerdb if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.