head to head · open source
CocoIndex vs CloudQuery
CocoIndex has 11,812 GitHub stars, 923 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloudQuery has 6,551 stars, 567 forks, 166 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CocoIndex leads on adoption by 80% (11,812 vs 6,551 stars). CocoIndex is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; CloudQuery is written in Go under MPL-2.0. CocoIndex has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, CloudQuery 9%. CocoIndex was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-engineering), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CocoIndex | CloudQuery | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 12K | ★ 6.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 923 | ⑂ 567 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CocoIndex if
- You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CloudQuery if
- You want the CloudQuery feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and CloudQuery fits your workflow better
About CocoIndex
Your agents deserve fresh context. Star us ❤️ → · · · CocoIndex turns codebases, meeting notes, inboxes, Slack, PDFs, and videos into live, continuously fresh context for your AI agents and LLM apps to reason over effectively — with minimal incremental processing. Get your production AI agent ready in 10 minutes with reliable, continuously fresh data — no stale batches, no context gap Incremental · only the delta · Any scale · parallel by default · Declarative · Python, 5 min Deutsch English Español français 日本語 한국어 Português Русский 中文 Built with CocoIndex ❤️ <img src=" alt="CocoIndex code — flagship MCP server…
read the full CocoIndex overview →
About CloudQuery
CloudOps, without the chaos CloudQuery is a cloud asset inventory built for platform teams. Sync your cloud infrastructure metadata into your data warehouse, powering insights and automation. Unify data and provide context across AWS, Azure, GCP, and 70+ cloud and SaaS sources such as Wiz, Finout, and GitHub. Installation Check out the quickstart guide for install guides for Linux and Windows and for step by step instructions on completing your first sync with CloudQuery. Why CloudQuery? Specialized plugin coverage Support for cloud infrastructure, security, and FinOps sources with normalization, rate limit…
read the full CloudQuery overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Engineering & Integration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CocoIndex or CloudQuery more popular?
CocoIndex has 11,812 GitHub stars and CloudQuery has 6,551. CocoIndex has the larger community by that measure.
Are CocoIndex and CloudQuery free?
Both are open source. CocoIndex is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CloudQuery under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CocoIndex and CloudQuery?
CocoIndex is written in Rust and CloudQuery in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CocoIndex or CloudQuery?
Choose CocoIndex if you want the larger community (11,812 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose CloudQuery if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.