head to head · open source
CocoIndex vs steampipe
CocoIndex has 11,812 GitHub stars, 923 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped yesterday. steampipe has 7,993 stars, 347 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CocoIndex leads on adoption by 48% (11,812 vs 7,993 stars). CocoIndex is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; steampipe is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. CocoIndex has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, steampipe 4%. CocoIndex was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (etl), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CocoIndex | steampipe | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 12K | ★ 8.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 923 | ⑂ 347 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CocoIndex if
- You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick steampipe if
- You want the steampipe feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and steampipe fits your workflow better
About CocoIndex
Your agents deserve fresh context. Star us ❤️ → · · · CocoIndex turns codebases, meeting notes, inboxes, Slack, PDFs, and videos into live, continuously fresh context for your AI agents and LLM apps to reason over effectively — with minimal incremental processing. Get your production AI agent ready in 10 minutes with reliable, continuously fresh data — no stale batches, no context gap Incremental · only the delta · Any scale · parallel by default · Declarative · Python, 5 min Deutsch English Español français 日本語 한국어 Português Русский 中文 Built with CocoIndex ❤️ <img src=" alt="CocoIndex code — flagship MCP server…
read the full CocoIndex overview →
About steampipe
select from cloud; Steampipe is the zero ETL way to query APIs and services. Use it to expose data sources to SQL. SQL . It's been the data access standard for decades. Live data . Query APIs in real time. Speed . Query APIs faster than you ever thought possible. Concurrency . Query many data sources in parallel. Single binary . Use it locally, deploy it in CI/CD pipelines. Demo time! Documentation See the documentation for: Running queries Managing Steampipe CLI commands Integrations Developing plugins Install Steampipe Install Steampipe from the downloads page: Install a plugin for your favorite service (e.g…
read the full steampipe overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Engineering & Integration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CocoIndex or steampipe more popular?
CocoIndex has 11,812 GitHub stars and steampipe has 7,993. CocoIndex has the larger community by that measure.
Are CocoIndex and steampipe free?
Both are open source. CocoIndex is licensed under Apache-2.0 and steampipe under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CocoIndex and steampipe?
CocoIndex is written in Rust and steampipe in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CocoIndex or steampipe?
Choose CocoIndex if you want the larger community (11,812 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose steampipe if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.