head to head · open source
Cube vs CocoIndex
Cube has 21,147 GitHub stars, 2,179 forks, 1,185 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CocoIndex has 11,812 stars, 923 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cube leads on adoption by 79% (21,147 vs 11,812 stars). Cube is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence; CocoIndex is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Cube has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, CocoIndex 8%. Cube was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cube | CocoIndex | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 12K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 923 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cube if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CocoIndex if
- You want the CocoIndex feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and CocoIndex fits your workflow better
About Cube
Website • Docs • Examples • Blog • Slack • X Cube Core is the open source semantic layer. Define metrics, dimensions, joins, and access rules once in code, then expose them through SQL, REST, and GraphQL APIs to anything downstream — BI tools, custom applications, or AI agents. Cube Core is headless: it doesn't ship a UI, so you can build the analytics experience that fits your product. Cube Core works with all SQL data sources, including cloud data warehouses like Snowflake, Databricks, and BigQuery; query engines like Presto and Amazon Athena; and application databases like Postgres. It has a built in…
About CocoIndex
Your agents deserve fresh context. Star us ❤️ → · · · CocoIndex turns codebases, meeting notes, inboxes, Slack, PDFs, and videos into live, continuously fresh context for your AI agents and LLM apps to reason over effectively — with minimal incremental processing. Get your production AI agent ready in 10 minutes with reliable, continuously fresh data — no stale batches, no context gap Incremental · only the delta · Any scale · parallel by default · Declarative · Python, 5 min Deutsch English Español français 日本語 한국어 Português Русский 中文 Built with CocoIndex ❤️ <img src=" alt="CocoIndex code — flagship MCP server…
read the full CocoIndex overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Engineering & Integration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cube or CocoIndex more popular?
Cube has 21,147 GitHub stars and CocoIndex has 11,812. Cube has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cube and CocoIndex free?
Both are open source. Cube has no licence declared in this registry, and CocoIndex is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Cube and CocoIndex?
Cube is written in Rust and CocoIndex in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cube or CocoIndex?
Choose Cube if you want the larger community (21,147 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose CocoIndex if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.