head to head · open source

cloudreve vs PasswordPusher

cloudreve has 28,763 GitHub stars, 3,903 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. PasswordPusher has 3,202 stars, 460 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cloudreve leads on adoption by 798% (28,763 vs 3,202 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; PasswordPusher is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, PasswordPusher 14%. PasswordPusher was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cloudreve ★ 29K PasswordPusher ★ 3.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cloudreve PasswordPusher
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 3.2K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Ruby
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 460
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cloudreve if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cloudreve profile →

pick PasswordPusher if

  • You want the PasswordPusher feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and PasswordPusher fits your workflow better

full PasswordPusher profile →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

About PasswordPusher

PasswordPusher is an Apache 2.0 licensed Ruby web application for sharing passwords, notes, files and URLs as self deleting links that expire after a set number of views or a set duration, with audit logs recording who viewed what, and when.

read the full PasswordPusher overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs cloudreve localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cloudreve vs LocalSend cloudreve vs rclone cloudreve vs copyparty cloudreve vs Files cloudreve vs yazi cloudreve vs Spacedrive cloudreve vs Nextcloud cloudreve vs uppy cloudreve vs superfile cloudreve vs ranger cloudreve vs Seafile cloudreve vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is cloudreve or PasswordPusher more popular?

cloudreve has 28,763 GitHub stars and PasswordPusher has 3,202. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.

Are cloudreve and PasswordPusher free?

Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and PasswordPusher under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cloudreve and PasswordPusher?

cloudreve is written in Go and PasswordPusher in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cloudreve or PasswordPusher?

Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,763 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose PasswordPusher if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.