head to head · open source
cloudreve vs Meteor-Files
cloudreve has 28,944 GitHub stars, 3,929 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. Meteor-Files has 1,113 stars, 165 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. cloudreve leads on adoption by 2,501% (28,944 vs 1,113 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; Meteor-Files is written in JavaScript under BSD-3-Clause. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, Meteor-Files 15%. cloudreve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| cloudreve | Meteor-Files | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.9K | ⑂ 165 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick cloudreve if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Meteor-Files if
- You want the Meteor-Files feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Meteor-Files fits your workflow better
About cloudreve
中文版本 Cloudreve Self hosted file management system with multi cloud support. Homepage • Try it • Discussion • Documents • Download • Telegram • Discord :sparkles: Features :cloud: Support storing files into Local, Remote node, OneDrive, S3 compatible API, Qiniu Kodo, Aliyun OSS, Tencent COS, Huawei Cloud OBS, Kingsoft Cloud KS3, Upyun. :outbox tray: Upload/Download in directly transmission from client to storage providers. 💾 Integrate with Aria2/qBittorrent to download files in background, use multiple download nodes to share the load. 📚 Compress/Extract/Preview archived files, download files in batch. 💻…
read the full cloudreve overview →
About Meteor-Files
Files for Meteor.js Stable, fast, robust, and well maintained Meteor.js package for files management using MongoDB Collection API. Call .insertAsync() method to initiate a file upload and to insert new record into MongoDB collection after upload is complete. Calling .removeAsync() method would erase stored file and record from MongoDB Collection. And so on, no need to learn new APIs. Hackable via hooks and events. Supports uploads to AWS:S3, GridFS, Google Storage, DropBox, and other 3rd party storage. ToC: 📔 Documentation Docs, API, Demos, Examples ✨ Key features 📔 API Documentation ⚡️ Quick start : 🔧…
read the full Meteor-Files overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is cloudreve or Meteor-Files more popular?
cloudreve has 28,944 GitHub stars and Meteor-Files has 1,113. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.
Are cloudreve and Meteor-Files free?
Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Meteor-Files under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between cloudreve and Meteor-Files?
cloudreve is written in Go and Meteor-Files in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, cloudreve or Meteor-Files?
Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,944 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Meteor-Files if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.