head to head · open source
cloudreve vs ffsend
cloudreve has 28,929 GitHub stars, 3,935 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. ffsend has 7,423 stars, 207 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 12 months ago. cloudreve leads on adoption by 290% (28,929 vs 7,423 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, ffsend 3%. cloudreve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| cloudreve | ffsend | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 7.4K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2025-11-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.9K | ⑂ 207 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick cloudreve if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ffsend if
- You want the ffsend feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and ffsend fits your workflow better
About cloudreve
中文版本 Cloudreve Self hosted file management system with multi cloud support. Homepage • Try it • Discussion • Documents • Download • Telegram • Discord :sparkles: Features :cloud: Support storing files into Local, Remote node, OneDrive, S3 compatible API, Qiniu Kodo, Aliyun OSS, Tencent COS, Huawei Cloud OBS, Kingsoft Cloud KS3, Upyun. :outbox tray: Upload/Download in directly transmission from client to storage providers. 💾 Integrate with Aria2/qBittorrent to download files in background, use multiple download nodes to share the load. 📚 Compress/Extract/Preview archived files, download files in batch. 💻…
read the full cloudreve overview →
About ffsend
[![Build status on GitLab CI][gitlab ci master badge]][gitlab ci link] [![Newest release on crates.io][crate version badge]][crate link] [![Project license][crate license badge]](LICENSE) [crate license badge]: [crate link]: [crate version badge]: [gitlab ci link]: [gitlab ci master badge]: Notice: the default Send host is provided by [@timvisee][timvisee] (info). Please consider to [donate] and help keep it running. ffsend Easily and securely share files from the command line. A [Send][send] client. Easily and securely share files and directories from the command line through a safe, private and encrypted link…
read the full ffsend overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is cloudreve or ffsend more popular?
cloudreve has 28,929 GitHub stars and ffsend has 7,423. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.
Are cloudreve and ffsend free?
Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ffsend under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between cloudreve and ffsend?
cloudreve is written in Go and ffsend in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, cloudreve or ffsend?
Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,929 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ffsend if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.