head to head · open source

cloudflared vs SoftEtherVPN

cloudflared has 16,043 GitHub stars, 1,468 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. SoftEtherVPN has 13,613 stars, 2,782 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. cloudflared leads on adoption by 18% (16,043 vs 13,613 stars). cloudflared is written in Go under Apache-2.0; SoftEtherVPN is written in C under Apache-2.0. cloudflared has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, SoftEtherVPN 20%. cloudflared was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cloudflared ★ 16K SoftEtherVPN ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cloudflared SoftEtherVPN
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-01
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cloudflared if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cloudflared profile →

pick SoftEtherVPN if

  • You want the SoftEtherVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and SoftEtherVPN fits your workflow better

full SoftEtherVPN profile →

About cloudflared

cloudflared is the open source command line client and tunneling daemon for Cloudflare Tunnel, a Go program under the Apache 2.0 licence that proxies traffic from the Cloudflare network to your origins so a webserver can stay closed to the public internet, and it is aimed at operators, platform teams and developers who need to publish HTTP services or reach private origins without opening inbound firewall ports.

read the full cloudflared overview →

About SoftEtherVPN

SoftEther VPN is an open source, cross platform, multi protocol VPN server and client, written in C and licensed under Apache 2.0, intended for administrators and self hosters who need one program to serve many VPN protocols instead of running several separate daemons.

read the full SoftEtherVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

cloudflared vs frp cloudflared vs caddy cloudflared vs traefik cloudflared vs AdGuardHome cloudflared vs nginx cloudflared vs algo cloudflared vs nginx-proxy cloudflared vs goproxy cloudflared vs openvpn-install cloudflared vs amnezia-client cloudflared vs OpenVPN cloudflared vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is cloudflared or SoftEtherVPN more popular?

cloudflared has 16,043 GitHub stars and SoftEtherVPN has 13,613. cloudflared has the larger community by that measure.

Are cloudflared and SoftEtherVPN free?

Both are open source. cloudflared is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SoftEtherVPN under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cloudflared and SoftEtherVPN?

cloudflared is written in Go and SoftEtherVPN in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cloudflared or SoftEtherVPN?

Choose cloudflared if you want the larger community (16,043 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SoftEtherVPN if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.