head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs zip.js
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zip.js has 3,905 stars, 546 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 1,300% (54,665 vs 3,905 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; zip.js is written in JavaScript under BSD-3-Clause. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, zip.js 14%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | zip.js | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 546 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick zip.js if
- You want the zip.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and zip.js fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About zip.js
Introduction zip.js is a JavaScript open source library (BSD 3 Clause license) for compressing and decompressing zip files. It has been designed to handle large amounts of data. It supports notably multi core compression, native compression with compression streams, pluggable compression engines, archives larger than 4GB with Zip64, split zip files, data encryption, incremental writing, and Deflate64 decompression. Demo See Documentation See here for more info: Examples Hello world Run the code on JSFiddle: Hello world with the filesystem API The filesystem API stores the entries in a tree instead of a flat…
read the full zip.js overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or zip.js more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and zip.js has 3,905. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and zip.js free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and zip.js under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and zip.js?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and zip.js in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or zip.js?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose zip.js if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.