head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs Thorium-Win
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Thorium-Win has 2,562 stars, 55 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 2,034% (54,665 vs 2,562 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Thorium-Win is written in Batchfile under BSD-3-Clause. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Thorium-Win 2%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chrome), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | Thorium-Win | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 2.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | TypeScript | Batchfile |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 55 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Thorium-Win if
- You want the Thorium-Win feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Batchfile
- You evaluated both and Thorium-Win fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About Thorium-Win
Thorium for Windows Repo to serve Windows builds of Thorium! \ IMPORTANT: PLEASE USE THE NEW WINDOWS 7/8 REPO HERE FOR WINDOWS 7/8/8.1 RELEASES \ NEW: AVX2 Builds are now being served at This repo only hosts Windows builds. The other Thorium repos : Main repo that hosts the source code for all platforms and serves linux builds Windows AVX2 repo that serves AVX2 Windows builds MacOS builds for x64 and M1 ARM64 are here \ Android builds for ARM32 and ARM64 are here \ Raspberry Pi (ARM64) builds are here \ Builds for Windows 7/8/8.1 are here \ Windows on ARM (arm64) builds are here \ Special repo which serves…
read the full Thorium-Win overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or Thorium-Win more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and Thorium-Win has 2,562. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and Thorium-Win free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Thorium-Win under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and Thorium-Win?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and Thorium-Win in Batchfile. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or Thorium-Win?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Thorium-Win if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.