head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs search-by-image
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. search-by-image has 3,806 stars, 321 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 1,336% (54,665 vs 3,806 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; search-by-image is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, search-by-image 8%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | search-by-image | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 321 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick search-by-image if
- You want the search-by-image feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and search-by-image fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About search-by-image
Search by Image Sponsors Lenso.ai Explore billions of images from all around the web. Search for places, people, duplicates, and more. Supporting the Project The continued development of Search by Image is made possible thanks to the support of awesome backers. If you'd like to join them, please consider contributing with Patreon, PayPal or Bitcoin. Description Search by Image is a browser extension that makes effortless reverse image searches possible, and comes with support for more than 30 search engines. The extension helps journalists and researchers verify the authenticity of images, and assists in the…
read the full search-by-image overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or search-by-image more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and search-by-image has 3,806. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and search-by-image free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and search-by-image under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and search-by-image?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and search-by-image in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or search-by-image?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose search-by-image if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.