head to head · open source

chrome-devtools-mcp vs RSSHub-Radar

chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. RSSHub-Radar has 7,387 stars, 421 forks, 69 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 640% (54,665 vs 7,387 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; RSSHub-Radar is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, RSSHub-Radar 6%. RSSHub-Radar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

chrome-devtools-mcp ★ 55K RSSHub-Radar ★ 7.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

chrome-devtools-mcp RSSHub-Radar
GitHub stars ★ 55K ★ 7.4K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.3K ⑂ 421
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick chrome-devtools-mcp if

  • You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full chrome-devtools-mcp profile →

pick RSSHub-Radar if

  • You want the RSSHub-Radar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and RSSHub-Radar fits your workflow better

full RSSHub-Radar profile →

About chrome-devtools-mcp

Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…

read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →

About RSSHub-Radar

RSSHub Radar Browser extension that simplifies finding and subscribing RSS and RSSHub. Everything is RSSible Tested for compatibility with the following browsers (other Chromium based browsers should also work): Introduction Telegram group Telegram channel RSSHub Radar is a spin off project of RSSHub, a browser extension that simplifies finding and subscribing RSS and RSSHub. Discover and subscribe to the RSS feeds associated with the current page effortlessly. Explore and subscribe to the RSSHub supported by the current page promptly. Easily identify the RSSHubs supported by the current website quickly…

read the full RSSHub-Radar overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Frequently asked questions

Is chrome-devtools-mcp or RSSHub-Radar more popular?

chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and RSSHub-Radar has 7,387. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.

Are chrome-devtools-mcp and RSSHub-Radar free?

Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and RSSHub-Radar under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and RSSHub-Radar?

chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and RSSHub-Radar in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or RSSHub-Radar?

Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose RSSHub-Radar if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.