head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs llm-scraper
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. llm-scraper has 6,951 stars, 453 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 686% (54,665 vs 6,951 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; llm-scraper is written in TypeScript under MIT. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, llm-scraper 7%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser, puppeteer), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | llm-scraper | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 7.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 453 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick llm-scraper if
- You want the llm-scraper feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and llm-scraper fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About llm-scraper
LLM Scraper LLM Scraper is a TypeScript library that allows you to extract structured data from any webpage using LLMs. [!IMPORTANT] LLM Scraper was updated to version 2.0. The new version comes with Vercel AI SDK 6 support and updated examples. Features Supports GPT, Sonnet, Gemini, Llama, Qwen model series Schemas defined with Zod or JSON Schema Full type safety with TypeScript Based on Playwright framework Streaming objects Code generation Supports 6 formatting modes: html for loading pre processed HTML raw html for loading raw HTML (no processing) markdown for loading markdown text for loading extracted text…
read the full llm-scraper overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or llm-scraper more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and llm-scraper has 6,951. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and llm-scraper free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and llm-scraper under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and llm-scraper?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and llm-scraper in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or llm-scraper?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose llm-scraper if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.