head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs ghostty-web
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ghostty-web has 3,011 stars, 195 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 1,716% (54,665 vs 3,011 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; ghostty-web is written in TypeScript under MIT. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ghostty-web 6%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | ghostty-web | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 3.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 195 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ghostty-web if
- You want the ghostty-web feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ghostty-web fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About ghostty-web
ghostty web Ghostty for the web with xterm.js API compatibility — giving you a proper VT100 implementation in the browser. Migrate from xterm by changing your import: @xterm/xterm → ghostty web WASM compiled parser from Ghostty—the same code that runs the native app Zero runtime dependencies, 400KB WASM bundle Originally created for Mux (a desktop app for isolated, parallel agentic development), but designed to be used anywhere. Try It Live Demo on an ephemeral VM (thank you to Greg from disco.cloud for hosting). On your computer: This starts a loopback only HTTP server with a real shell on The demo protects /ws…
read the full ghostty-web overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or ghostty-web more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and ghostty-web has 3,011. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and ghostty-web free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ghostty-web under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and ghostty-web?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and ghostty-web in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or ghostty-web?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ghostty-web if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.