head to head · open source

chrome-devtools-mcp vs Floorp

chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Floorp has 8,476 stars, 285 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 545% (54,665 vs 8,476 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Floorp is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Floorp 3%. Floorp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

chrome-devtools-mcp ★ 55K Floorp ★ 8.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

chrome-devtools-mcp Floorp
GitHub stars ★ 55K ★ 8.5K
License Apache-2.0 MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.3K ⑂ 285
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick chrome-devtools-mcp if

  • You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full chrome-devtools-mcp profile →

pick Floorp if

  • You want the Floorp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Floorp fits your workflow better

full Floorp profile →

About chrome-devtools-mcp

Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…

read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →

About Floorp

Floorp Browser A browser built for keeping the Open, Private and Sustainable Web alive. Based on Mozilla Firefox. [![Contributors][contributors shield]][contributors url] [![Forks][forks shield]][forks url] [![Stargazers][stars shield]][stars url] [![Issues][issues shield]][issues url] [![License][license shield]][license url] [contributors shield]: [contributors url]: [forks shield]: [forks url]: [stars shield]: [stars url]: [issues shield]: [issues url]: [license shield]: [license url]: Floorp Browser A browser built for keeping the Open, Private and Sustainable Web alive. Based on Mozilla Firefox. Official…

read the full Floorp overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Frequently asked questions

Is chrome-devtools-mcp or Floorp more popular?

chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and Floorp has 8,476. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.

Are chrome-devtools-mcp and Floorp free?

Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Floorp under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and Floorp?

chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and Floorp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or Floorp?

Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Floorp if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.