head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs eventemitter3
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. eventemitter3 has 3,535 stars, 237 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 1,446% (54,665 vs 3,535 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; eventemitter3 is written in JavaScript under MIT. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, eventemitter3 7%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | eventemitter3 | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 3.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-01-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 237 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick eventemitter3 if
- You want the eventemitter3 feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and eventemitter3 fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About eventemitter3
EventEmitter3 EventEmitter3 is a high performance EventEmitter. It has been micro optimized for various of code paths making this, one of, if not the fastest EventEmitter available for Node.js and browsers. The module is API compatible with the EventEmitter that ships by default with Node.js but there are some slight differences: Domain support has been removed. We do not throw an error when you emit an error event and nobody is listening. The newListener and removeListener events have been removed as they are useful only in some uncommon use cases. The setMaxListeners , getMaxListeners , prependListener and…
read the full eventemitter3 overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or eventemitter3 more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and eventemitter3 has 3,535. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and eventemitter3 free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and eventemitter3 under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and eventemitter3?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and eventemitter3 in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or eventemitter3?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose eventemitter3 if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.