head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs competitive-companion
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. competitive-companion has 1,339 stars, 220 forks, 90 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 3,983% (54,665 vs 1,339 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; competitive-companion is written in TypeScript under MIT. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, competitive-companion 16%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | competitive-companion | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 220 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick competitive-companion if
- You want the competitive-companion feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and competitive-companion fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About competitive-companion
Competitive Companion [link cws]: [link amo]: [ ][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ ][link amo] [ ][link amo] [ ][link amo] A browser extension which parses competitive programming problems from various online judges (like AtCoder and Codeforces) and sends them to various tools (like CP Editor and CPH). Capable of parsing problems and contests and extracting data like the example testcases and the time and memory constraints. Install [ Chrome extension][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ Firefox add on][link amo] [ ][link amo] Tools that use Competitive Companion acmX AI Virtual Assistant Assistant.nvim AutoCp…
read the full competitive-companion overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or competitive-companion more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and competitive-companion has 1,339. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and competitive-companion free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and competitive-companion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and competitive-companion?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and competitive-companion in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or competitive-companion?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose competitive-companion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.