head to head · open source
Bruno vs WunderGraph
Bruno has 47,982 GitHub stars, 3,066 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. WunderGraph has 1,287 stars, 264 forks, 124 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 3,628% (47,982 vs 1,287 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; WunderGraph is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, WunderGraph 21%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | WunderGraph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 264 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WunderGraph if
- You want the WunderGraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and WunderGraph fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno Opensource IDE for exploring and testing APIs. English Українська Русский Türkçe Deutsch Français Português (BR) 한국어 বাংলা Español Italiano Română Polski 简体中文 正體中文 العربية 日本語 ქართული Nederlands فارسی Bruno is a new and innovative API client, aimed at revolutionizing the status quo represented by Postman and similar tools out there. Bruno stores your collections directly in a folder on your filesystem. We use a plain text markup language, Bru, to save information about API requests. You can use Git or any version control of your choice to collaborate over your API collections. Bruno is offline only. There…
read the full Bruno overview →
About WunderGraph
WunderGraph Cosmo The GraphQL Federation Platform Reach for the stars, ignite your cosmo! Quickstart · Examples · Docs · CLI · Community · Changelog · Hiring Overview WunderGraph Cosmo is a comprehensive Lifecycle API Management platform tailored for Federated GraphQL. It encompasses everything from Schema Registry, composition checks, and analytics, to metrics, tracing, and routing. Whether you’re looking to deploy 100% on prem or prefer a Managed Service, Cosmo offers flexibility without vendor lock in, all under the Apache 2.0 license. The State of GraphQL Federation 2024 Get insights from industry experts…
read the full WunderGraph overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or WunderGraph more popular?
Bruno has 47,982 GitHub stars and WunderGraph has 1,287. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and WunderGraph free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and WunderGraph under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and WunderGraph?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and WunderGraph in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or WunderGraph?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,982 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WunderGraph if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.