head to head · open source

Bruno vs uusec-waf

Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars, 2,890 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. uusec-waf has 1,713 stars, 170 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 2,645% (47,027 vs 1,713 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; uusec-waf is written in Shell under BSD-2-Clause. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, uusec-waf 10%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K uusec-waf ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno uusec-waf
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 1.7K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in JavaScript Shell
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-06
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick uusec-waf if

  • You want the uusec-waf feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and uusec-waf fits your workflow better

full uusec-waf profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About uusec-waf

🏠 Home 中文版 ⭐Please help us with a star to support our continuous improvement, thank you! Introduction UUSEC WAF Web Application Firewall is an industrial grade free, high performance, and highly scalable web application and API security protection product that supports AI and semantic engines. It is a comprehensive website protection product launched by UUSEC Technology, which first realizes the three layer defense function of traffic layer, system layer, and runtime layer. GitHub Daily Trend :dart: Technical advantages :ophiuchus: Intelligent 0 day defense UUSEC WAF innovatively applies machine learning technol…

read the full uusec-waf overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs Insomnia Bruno vs one-api Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or uusec-waf more popular?

Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars and uusec-waf has 1,713. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and uusec-waf free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and uusec-waf under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and uusec-waf?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and uusec-waf in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or uusec-waf?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,027 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose uusec-waf if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.