head to head · open source
Bruno vs swag
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars, 3,068 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. swag has 13,047 stars, 1,494 forks, 476 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 268% (47,992 vs 13,047 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; swag is written in Go under MIT. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, swag 11%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openapi), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | swag | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 13K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick swag if
- You want the swag feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and swag fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno Opensource IDE for exploring and testing APIs. English Українська Русский Türkçe Deutsch Français Português (BR) 한국어 বাংলা Español Italiano Română Polski 简体中文 正體中文 العربية 日本語 ქართული Nederlands فارسی Bruno is a new and innovative API client, aimed at revolutionizing the status quo represented by Postman and similar tools out there. Bruno stores your collections directly in a folder on your filesystem. We use a plain text markup language, Bru, to save information about API requests. You can use Git or any version control of your choice to collaborate over your API collections. Bruno is offline only. There…
read the full Bruno overview →
About swag
swag 🌍 English ∙ 简体中文 ∙ Português Swag converts Go annotations to Swagger Documentation 2.0. We've created a variety of plugins for popular Go web frameworks. This allows you to quickly integrate with an existing Go project (using Swagger UI). Contents Getting started Supported Web Frameworks How to use it with Gin The swag formatter Implementation Status Declarative Comments Format General API Info API Operation Security Examples Descriptions over multiple lines User defined structure with an array type Function scoped struct declaration Model composition in response Add request headers Add response headers…
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or swag more popular?
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars and swag has 13,047. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and swag free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and swag under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and swag?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and swag in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or swag?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,992 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose swag if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.