head to head · open source

Bruno vs orpc

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars, 2,888 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. orpc has 5,628 stars, 170 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bruno leads on adoption by 736% (47,022 vs 5,628 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; orpc is written in TypeScript under MIT. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, orpc 3%. orpc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openapi), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K orpc ★ 5.6K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno orpc
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 5.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick orpc if

  • You want the orpc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and orpc fits your workflow better

full orpc profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About orpc

oRPC is an MIT licensed TypeScript toolkit for building and consuming end to end typesafe APIs, aimed at TypeScript developers on Node.js, Bun, Deno, Next.js, React, SolidJS, Vue/Pinia, and Cloudflare Workers.

read the full orpc overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs Insomnia Bruno vs one-api Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or orpc more popular?

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars and orpc has 5,628. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and orpc free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and orpc under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and orpc?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and orpc in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or orpc?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose orpc if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.