head to head · open source
Bruno vs metamcp
Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars, 2,890 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. metamcp has 2,672 stars, 433 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 1,660% (47,027 vs 2,672 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; metamcp is written in TypeScript under MIT. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, metamcp 16%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | metamcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 2.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-06-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 433 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick metamcp if
- You want the metamcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and metamcp fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.
read the full Bruno overview →
About metamcp
🚀 MetaMCP (MCP Aggregator, Orchestrator, Middleware, Gateway in one docker) 📢 Latest Update: This ai dev branch will be the forward onging dev branch which contains ai agent changes. Please test before you build the image based on this branch. There has been many PRs thanks to the community but merging and reviewing them has been a growing effort too. I decided to include ai changes. At least so far the core functionality works. There is also a community maintained fork (ty a lot!): 📢 Update: From the author: apologize for some recent maintainence delay, but will at least keep merging PRs, more background [her…
read the full metamcp overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or metamcp more popular?
Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars and metamcp has 2,672. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and metamcp free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and metamcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and metamcp?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and metamcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or metamcp?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,027 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose metamcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.