head to head · open source
Bruno vs kubernetes-client
Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars, 2,888 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kubernetes-client has 3,677 stars, 1,519 forks, 115 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 1,179% (47,022 vs 3,677 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; kubernetes-client is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, kubernetes-client 41%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | kubernetes-client | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 3.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick kubernetes-client if
- You want the kubernetes-client feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and kubernetes-client fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.
read the full Bruno overview →
About kubernetes-client
Kubernetes & OpenShift Java Client is a Java library that provides access to the full Kubernetes and OpenShift REST APIs through a fluent domain specific language. It lives in the Kubernetes and OpenShift ecosystem, and it is distributed as Java artifacts for JVM based applications, services, and tooling.
read the full kubernetes-client overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or kubernetes-client more popular?
Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars and kubernetes-client has 3,677. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and kubernetes-client free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and kubernetes-client under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and kubernetes-client?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and kubernetes-client in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or kubernetes-client?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kubernetes-client if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.