head to head · open source

Bruno vs kubb

Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars, 2,890 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. kubb has 1,802 stars, 147 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bruno leads on adoption by 2,510% (47,027 vs 1,802 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; kubb is written in TypeScript under MIT. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, kubb 8%. kubb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openapi), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K kubb ★ 1.8K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno kubb
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 1.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 147
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick kubb if

  • You want the kubb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and kubb fits your workflow better

full kubb profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About kubb

Kubb is an MIT licensed TypeScript meta framework for code generation that turns an OpenAPI schema into type safe TypeScript types, HTTP clients, data fetching hooks, validators, and mocks for front end and full stack developers.

read the full kubb overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs Insomnia Bruno vs one-api Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or kubb more popular?

Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars and kubb has 1,802. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and kubb free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and kubb under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and kubb?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and kubb in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or kubb?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,027 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kubb if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.