head to head · open source
Bruno vs kiro-gateway
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars, 3,068 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kiro-gateway has 2,344 stars, 560 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 1,947% (47,992 vs 2,344 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; kiro-gateway is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, kiro-gateway 24%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | kiro-gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-05-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 560 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick kiro-gateway if
- You want the kiro-gateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and kiro-gateway fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno Opensource IDE for exploring and testing APIs. English Українська Русский Türkçe Deutsch Français Português (BR) 한국어 বাংলা Español Italiano Română Polski 简体中文 正體中文 العربية 日本語 ქართული Nederlands فارسی Bruno is a new and innovative API client, aimed at revolutionizing the status quo represented by Postman and similar tools out there. Bruno stores your collections directly in a folder on your filesystem. We use a plain text markup language, Bru, to save information about API requests. You can use Git or any version control of your choice to collaborate over your API collections. Bruno is offline only. There…
read the full Bruno overview →
About kiro-gateway
👻 Kiro Gateway Proxy gateway for Kiro API (Amazon Q Developer / AWS CodeWhisperer) 🇬🇧 English • 🇷🇺 Русский • 🇨🇳 中文 • 🇪🇸 Español • 🇮🇩 Indonesia • 🇧🇷 Português • 🇯🇵 日本語 • 🇰🇷 한국어 Made with ❤️ by @Jwadow Use Claude models from Kiro with Claude Code, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Claw Code, Codex app, Cursor, Cline, Roo Code, Kilo Code, Obsidian, OpenAI SDK, LangChain, Continue and other OpenAI or Anthropic compatible tools Models • Features • Quick Start • Configuration • 💖 Sponsor 🤖 Available Models (Free List) ⚠️ Important: Model availability depends on your Kiro tier (free/paid). The gateway provides…
read the full kiro-gateway overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or kiro-gateway more popular?
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars and kiro-gateway has 2,344. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and kiro-gateway free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and kiro-gateway under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and kiro-gateway?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and kiro-gateway in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or kiro-gateway?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,992 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kiro-gateway if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.