head to head · open source

Bruno vs higress

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars, 2,888 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. higress has 9,397 stars, 1,304 forks, 1,114 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 400% (47,022 vs 9,397 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; higress is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, higress 14%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K higress ★ 9.4K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno higress
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 9.4K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick higress if

  • You want the higress feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and higress fits your workflow better

full higress profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About higress

Higress is a cloud native, AI native API gateway built on Istio and Envoy that targets platform engineering and AI infrastructure teams who need to route LLM API traffic and Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers through a single extensible, self hosted gateway.

read the full higress overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs Insomnia Bruno vs one-api Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or higress more popular?

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars and higress has 9,397. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and higress free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and higress under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and higress?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and higress in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or higress?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose higress if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.