head to head · open source

Bruno vs gateway

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars, 2,888 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gateway has 3,036 stars, 867 forks, 761 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 1,449% (47,022 vs 3,036 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; gateway is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, gateway 29%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K gateway ★ 3.0K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno gateway
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 3.0K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 867
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick gateway if

  • You want the gateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gateway fits your workflow better

full gateway profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About gateway

Envoy Gateway is an open source project that manages Envoy Proxy as a standalone or Kubernetes based application gateway. It lives in the Kubernetes and Envoy Proxy ecosystem, and it is associated with the CNCF, Gateway API, and go control plane topics. The project is written in Go and licensed under Apache 2.0.

read the full gateway overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs Insomnia Bruno vs one-api Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or gateway more popular?

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars and gateway has 3,036. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and gateway free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and gateway under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and gateway?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and gateway in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or gateway?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gateway if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.