head to head · open source

Bruno vs Firecamp

Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars, 3,068 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Firecamp has 2,620 stars, 170 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 1,732% (47,992 vs 2,620 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; Firecamp is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Firecamp 6%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (api-client), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 48K Firecamp ★ 2.6K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno Firecamp
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 2.6K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-03-04
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick Firecamp if

  • You want the Firecamp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Firecamp fits your workflow better

full Firecamp profile →

About Bruno

Bruno Opensource IDE for exploring and testing APIs. English Українська Русский Türkçe Deutsch Français Português (BR) 한국어 বাংলা Español Italiano Română Polski 简体中文 正體中文 العربية 日本語 ქართული Nederlands فارسی Bruno is a new and innovative API client, aimed at revolutionizing the status quo represented by Postman and similar tools out there. Bruno stores your collections directly in a folder on your filesystem. We use a plain text markup language, Bru, to save information about API requests. You can use Git or any version control of your choice to collaborate over your API collections. Bruno is offline only. There…

read the full Bruno overview →

About Firecamp

Firecamp Open Source Postman Alternative Firecamp Firecamp is a dx first API development platform that helps developers design, develop, test, and document their APIs effortlessly. With a user friendly interface and a range of powerful features, it streamlines the API development workflow and enhances collaboration among team members. 🌈 best in class developer experience inspired by vscode dx. 📡 multi protocol testing capabilities with Rest, GraphQL, Websocket, and SocketIO APIs. 👐 collaborate on API collections across the workspace and team ⛺ build APIs faster without switching between tools and apps…

read the full Firecamp overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or Firecamp more popular?

Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars and Firecamp has 2,620. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and Firecamp free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and Firecamp under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and Firecamp?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and Firecamp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or Firecamp?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,992 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Firecamp if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.