head to head · open source

Bruno vs CliRelay

Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars, 2,890 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CliRelay has 1,011 stars, 121 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bruno leads on adoption by 4,552% (47,027 vs 1,011 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; CliRelay is written in Go under MIT. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, CliRelay 12%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K CliRelay ★ 1.0K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno CliRelay
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 1.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 121
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick CliRelay if

  • You want the CliRelay feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and CliRelay fits your workflow better

full CliRelay profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About CliRelay

🔀 CliRelay A unified proxy server for AI CLI tools — use your existing subscriptions with any OpenAI / Gemini / Claude / Codex compatible client. Multi tenant web panel · request logs & quotas · routing groups & failover · self hosted English 中文 📖 Docs · 🖥️ Management Panel · 🐛 Report Bug · ✨ Request Feature ⚡ What is CliRelay? ✨ Heavily enhanced fork of the CLIProxyAPI project — rebuilt with a production grade management layer, web control panel hosting, and a terminal TUI for day 2 operations. CliRelay turns AI CLI subscriptions, OAuth credentials, API keys, and compatible upstream services into one managed…

read the full CliRelay overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs Insomnia Bruno vs one-api Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or CliRelay more popular?

Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars and CliRelay has 1,011. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and CliRelay free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and CliRelay under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and CliRelay?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and CliRelay in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or CliRelay?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,027 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CliRelay if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.